I have only 2 cents to add. 1) is there an actual STC proc? Or is it a shell command starting a Unix process?
2) there are a couple of C or Unix environment variables that can be set that would precede SYSTCPD. Rob Schramm On Oct 16, 2013 1:21 PM, "Jon Perryman" <[email protected]> wrote: > Stop thinking RESOLVER since you aren't implementing it. I can't find the > name resolution sequence but it was very similar to RESOLVER. It's been > several years since I looked at it so I can't give you all the specifics. > Here is the information you specifically want to know: > > 1. If zUNIX program, then use /etc/resolve.cnf (this is NOT resolver > specific) > 2. If no resolve.cnf then use DD SYSTCPD. > 3. If no SYSTCPD DD, then use SYS1.TCPPARMS(TCPDATA) > 4. If no SYS1.TCPPARMS(TCPDATA) then use TCPIP.TCPIP.DATA > > There are more but these are the most likely ones you might be using. > > 1. You could rename /etc/resolve.cnf so that it does not exist and falls > thru. > 2. You could have users omit DD SYSTCPD to fall thru > 3. You could rename SYS1.TCPPARMS(TCPDATA) to fall thru. > 4. You could use TCPIP.TCPIP.DATA as your single TCPDATA so that users > don't need to know about the DD SYSTCPD. > > > Jon Perryman. > > > >________________________________ > > From: David G. Schlecht <[email protected]> > > > > > >at the moment, we don't have a resolver proc. > > > > > >This means that if a job doesn't allocate the SYSTCPD DD then nothing > gets used and the name resolution fails, even though the DD is defined in > the TCP proc. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
