Set up RESOLVER now. It won't override any existing SYSTCPD. You will be far ahead in the long run.
> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of David G. Schlecht > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 1:36 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: NSLOOKUP on MVS vs OMVS > > Thanks. The problem stems from the issue that SYSTCPD in the TCPPROC is > not being used by RESOLVER. In fact, SYSTCPD in TCPPROC is worthless as it is > shipped. > > Seems terribly confusing to have this in the sample proc provided by IBM just > to find out that it doesn't do anything. > > We have a solution, or at least a workaround. We'll continue to add SYSTCPD > to every job that needs RESOLVER and will someday build an MVS proc for > RESOLVER that can use GLOBALTCPDATA. > > > David G. Schlecht | Information Technology Professional State of Nevada | > Department of Administration | Enterprise IT Services > T:(775)684-4328 | F: (775) 684‐4324 | E:[email protected] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 9:24 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: NSLOOKUP on MVS vs OMVS > > In > <[email protected]>, > on > 10/01/2013 > at 10:50 AM, "David G. Schlecht" <[email protected]> said: > > >Forgive me if this is obvious to everyone but me, but I’m seeing a > >difference in the way name resolution (resolver) works on MVS and OMVS. > >In OMVS, a command line ping or dig or nslookup all correctly resolve a > >domain name. However, issuing the PING or NSLOOKUP command in TSO or > >PING in batch return unknown host errors. > > A difference in name resolution almost certainly stems from a difference in > TCP parameters. Check what's in your batch JCL, your logon proc and your > Unix scripts. > > There has been discussion on IBM-MAIN in the past on the priorities of the > various sources for TCP configuration data, and it's documented in the CS > manuals. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
