Stop thinking RESOLVER since you aren't implementing it. I can't find the name resolution sequence but it was very similar to RESOLVER. It's been several years since I looked at it so I can't give you all the specifics. Here is the information you specifically want to know:
1. If zUNIX program, then use /etc/resolve.cnf (this is NOT resolver specific) 2. If no resolve.cnf then use DD SYSTCPD. 3. If no SYSTCPD DD, then use SYS1.TCPPARMS(TCPDATA) 4. If no SYS1.TCPPARMS(TCPDATA) then use TCPIP.TCPIP.DATA There are more but these are the most likely ones you might be using. 1. You could rename /etc/resolve.cnf so that it does not exist and falls thru. 2. You could have users omit DD SYSTCPD to fall thru 3. You could rename SYS1.TCPPARMS(TCPDATA) to fall thru. 4. You could use TCPIP.TCPIP.DATA as your single TCPDATA so that users don't need to know about the DD SYSTCPD. Jon Perryman. >________________________________ > From: David G. Schlecht <[email protected]> > > >at the moment, we don't have a resolver proc. > > >This means that if a job doesn't allocate the SYSTCPD DD then nothing gets >used and the name resolution fails, even though the DD is defined in the TCP >proc. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
