> What else did you try?

That was my next attempt after SYSOUT=* (first it whined that there was no 
SYSMDECK, another change from our old system).

> What would DYNALLOC or BPXWDYN accept?

Not sure what this is asking.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 12:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Would you consider this a compiler bug?

On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:44:06 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote:
>    ...
>After much tinkering, I found that it didn't like //SYSMDECK DD 
>SYSOUT=*
>
>Changing that to
>//SYSMDECK DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(CYL,(1,1)) made it happy.
>
What else did you try?  "SYSOUT=*" refers to MSGCLASS, which may not be 
meaningful within compilation.  "SYSOUT=A"?

What would DYNALLOC or BPXWDYN accept?

>Seems like I shouldn't be able to cause an internal compiler error that 
>trivially, no? Alas, we don't have a "real" IBM customer number, so I can't 
>report this normally. Just wondered if I was missing something obvious about 
>this.
>    ...
When I was enhancing a FOSS Pascal compiler, any  abnormal termination of the 
compiler automatically was reportable.

--
gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to