David. That IMS documentation seems to be a cut-and-paste from the SMP/E User Guide. I assumed that the user guide use of ‘and’ rather than ‘or’ was a mistake because my userid ID has BPX.SUPERUSER and a non-zero uid and I do not recall ever having unix permission problems.
Keith > On 23 May 2025, at 11:44, David Spiegel > <00000468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Hi Keith, > Did you see the reference mentioned by Gil?: > > Setting up UID(0) access for SMP/E installation - IBM Documentation > <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ims-es/3.2.0?topic=installation-setting-up-uid0-access-smpe> > > Is this also a mistake? > > Thanks and regards, > David > >> On 2025-05-23 03:43, Keith Gooding wrote: >> The unix authorisation requirements are spelled out in the section “Checking >> that you have the appropriate access” in the z/OS SMP/E User guide but in >> the first paragraph surely “and be UID 0” should read “or be UID 0” as in >> the second paragraph. >> >> >> Keith Gooding >> >>>> On 23 May 2025, at 04:24, Seymour J Metz<sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: >>> >>> Not for a long time. The job running SMP needs to have a userid with the >>> proper authorization. It's spelled out. >>> >>> I prefer to have SMP run under a separate userid, and only give my base >>> userid the access that it needs for other work. >>> >>> -- >>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >>> עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי >>> נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List<IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of >>> David Spiegel<00000468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> >>> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 5:59 PM >>> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> >>> Subject: SysProg UID(0)? >>> >>> >>> External Message: Use Caution >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> Is it absolutely necessary for SysProgs running SMP/e Jobs with USS >>> Maintenance to have UID(0)? >>> One reason I can think of is that the new files need to be owned by >>> UID(0)/GID(0). Another is that since "System" Directories (e.g. /usr) >>> are owned by UID(0)/GID(0), the new files cannot be placed there due to >>> the existing permission bits.) >>> >>> Please confirm/deny my reasoning. >>> >>> Thank you in advance. >>> >>> David >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
