On Thu, 22 May 2025 17:59:07 -0400, David Spiegel wrote: >Hi, >Is it absolutely necessary for SysProgs running SMP/e Jobs with USS >Maintenance to have UID(0)? >One reason I can think of is that the new files need to be owned by >UID(0)/GID(0). Another is that since "System" Directories (e.g. /usr) >are owned by UID(0)/GID(0), the new files cannot be placed there due to >the existing permission bits.) > >Please confirm/deny my reasoning. > ... Does BPX.SUPERUSER modify this? <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ims-es/3.2.0?topic=installation-setting-up-uid0-access-smpe> <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/3.1.0?topic=security-superusers-in-zos-unix>
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
