Thanks, for grins I did that, too, and the 2400 also shows after that. Tomorrow 
morning I expect to be able to declare victory here!

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2025 7:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Disable user timeout via JWT?

Issue a SET SMF=00 command. That'll reread the SMFPRM00 member activate the 
change.

Mark Jacobs

Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.

GPG Public Key - 
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com


On Sunday, May 18th, 2025 at 7:24 PM, Phil Smith III <li...@akphs.com> wrote:

> Right you are. I would have bet money I saw it in there, but obviously I was 
> wrong. See my other note...I think we've found the culprit, thanks to all 
> y'all's patient suggestions!
> 
> Last question is how to activate the change, and I'm betting it'll then be 
> cured...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf 
> Of Jeremy Nicoll
> 
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2025 7:19 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Disable user timeout via JWT?
> 
> On Sun, 18 May 2025, at 20:55, Phil Smith III wrote:
> 
> > But I just checked and all the members have JWT(2400).
> 
> 
> As Jay said, not in the D SMF,O output you show ... which also does not 
> mention IEFUTL.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to