An update: We've now removed not one, but two, copies of EDGUX100 in the QA system. (There were none in the production system.) The EDGI100I message is gone, but we're still getting the ABEND. Have a case open with IBM now.
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:09 AM Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: > SMP? > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר > > > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Jay Maynard > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2025 11:11 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: DFRMM S0C4/SF13 ABEND: EDGI100I being issued spuriously? > > > External Message: Use Caution > > > Yes, I've searched the entire linklist and LPA, and EDGUX100 does not > exist. > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:10 AM rpinion865 < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Have you verified that EDGUX100 is not being loaded/used? I read ALL of > > your first post, and you specifically said > > that EDGUX100 and UXTB had been converted. Sorry for not taking the time > > to read ALL of your post :) > > > > Current Data Set Allocation Member was > > found > > Command ===> Scroll > ===> > > CSR > > > > Message Act DDname Data Set Name Actions: B E V M F C > I > > Q > > Member: EDGUX100 > LINKLIST SYS1.LINKLIB > > > > > SYS1.MIGLIB > > > > > SYS1.CSSLIB > > > > > > > > > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." > > > > Bugs Bunny > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > > > On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 11:01 AM, rpinion865 < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If you do a D SSI from the console do you see anything about UXTB? > > > > > > SUBSYS=UXTB > > > DYNAMIC=YES STATUS=INACTIVE COMMANDS=REJECT > > > > > > > > > > > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." > > > > > > Bugs Bunny > > > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 10:35 AM, Jay Maynard > > [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > It is in production. We get the EDGI100I message there, and yet > things > > run > > > > fine. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 9:34 AM rpinion865 < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Looks like things have changed from the examples I shared. My > > examples > > > > > come from an OS/390 2.10 system. > > > > > > > > > > A more modern z/OS talks about EDGDEFxx. > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=edgdefxx-converting-from-using-uxtable-using-defaults-table > > > > > > > > > > But you are seeing abends that are related to the UXTB. Do you know > > if > > > > > the new functionality can run with > > > > > the UXTB? > > > > > > > > > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." > > > > > > > > > > Bugs Bunny > > > > > > > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 10:24 AM, Jay Maynard < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Is this still necessary if the same function is done in EDGDEF00, > > though? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 9:16 AM rpinion865 < > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would search for something, might be run as job as opposed to > > a STC, > > > > > > > that executes this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VIEW OS390.PROCLIB(EDGCVRSP) - 01.01 Columns 00001 > > > > > > > 00072 > > > > > > > Command ===> Scroll ===> > > > > > > > CSR > > > > > > > 000038 //LOADUXTB EXEC > > PGM=EDGCVRSL,REGION=4096K,PARM='&SSN.,&TAB.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bugs Bunny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 10:10 AM, rpinion865 < > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps, the UXTB is being created with a STC that does not > > use the > > > > > > > > IBM > > > > > > > > EDG* name. From the system > > > > > > > > where a UXTB is created, these are the messages you should > > see. The > > > > > > > > EDGX102I message indicates the UXTB > > > > > > > > has been created. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > STC32987 00000090 $HASP373 EDGCVRSP STARTED > > > > > > > > STC32986 00000290 IEF695I START LMSINIT WITH JOBNAME LMSINIT > IS > > > > > > > > ASSIGNED > > > > > > > > TO > > > > > > > > , GROUP PROCGRP > > > > > > > > STC32987 00000090 IEF403I EDGCVRSP - STARTED - TIME=11.31.16 > > > > > > > > STC32986 00000090 $HASP373 LMSINIT STARTED > > > > > > > > STC32986 00000090 IEF403I LMSINIT - STARTED - TIME=11.31.16 > > > > > > > > 00000290 IEF196I IEF237I 0301 ALLOCATED TO SYS00002 > > > > > > > > STC32987 00000090 EDGX102I DATA TABLE LOADED O.K. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bugs Bunny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 9:57 AM, Jay Maynard > > > > > > > > [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EDGCVRSP, that is. And no, that doesn't exist either. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 8:54 AM Jay Maynard > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The IBM webpage calls for that, in STC EDGVRSP. That > > started task > > > > > > > > > > proc > > > > > > > > > > doesn't exist on either system. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 8:51 AM rpinion865 < > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think you need to run a DFRMM STC which will set up > > the UXTB. > > > > > > > > > > > Off the > > > > > > > > > > > top of my head, I cannot > > > > > > > > > > > remember what STC does that. Maybe my suggestion will > > ring a > > > > > > > > > > > bell > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > you. If not, I can find out > > > > > > > > > > > what STC you need to run. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bugs Bunny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 9:47 AM, Jay Maynard < > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We're having a weird problem. On our QA LPAR, trying > > to do a > > > > > > > > > > > > tape mount > > > > > > > > > > > > (for an FDRABR restore operation) results in the > > following > > > > > > > > > > > > messages > > > > > > > > > > > > after the IEF455D for the tape mount: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EDGI100I SUBSYSTEM UXTB NOT DEFINED OR NO TABLE > LOADED > > > > > > > > > > > > EDG2003E ABEND S0C4 U0000 RSN 0017 DURING DFSMSrmm > > SUBSYSTEM > > > > > > > > > > > > PROCESSING > > > > > > > > > > > > AT > > > > > > > > > > > > 4C0DFA IN MODULE K j~ > > > > > > > > > > > > EDG4003E DFSMSrmm DETECTED CONTROL BLOCK ERROR 20, > 4084 > > > > > > > > > > > > DURING > > > > > > > > > > > > OPEN FOR > > > > > > > > > > > > VQ0002 BY TXNWABRR, UTABRRES, TAPE# > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everything we can find about the EDGI100I message > > talks about > > > > > > > > > > > > using > > > > > > > > > > > > EDGUX100 to set up processing for tape expiration. We > > had, at > > > > > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > > point in > > > > > > > > > > > > the past, had that exit in place and the associated > > table, > > > > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > during > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > installation of a previous z/OS, converted that to > > using the > > > > > > > > > > > > EDGDEF00 member to accomplish the same goal and > > removed the > > > > > > > > > > > > exit > > > > > > > > > > > > and the > > > > > > > > > > > > table. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The annoying thing about this is that this all works > > > > > > > > > > > > perfectly > > > > > > > > > > > > in our > > > > > > > > > > > > production LPAR. We've compared definitions and > modules > > > > > > > > > > > > between > > > > > > > > > > > > the two > > > > > > > > > > > > LPARs, and they're the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So...anyone have any suggestions as to where we can > > look? Why > > > > > > > > > > > > does RMM > > > > > > > > > > > > issue EDGI100I if the exit is not in use? I've tried > > looking > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > the 0C4 > > > > > > > > > > > > dump, and it wasn't very enlightening. We've > contacted > > BMC > > > > > > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > > > > > to make > > > > > > > > > > > > sure it's not FDR that's the culprit, and they found > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > victim, > > > > > > > > > > > > and pointed us to the same web page we keep tripping > > over at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://ibm.com/support/pages/rmm-message-edgi100i-issued . > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Jay Maynard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access > > > > > > > > > > > > instructions, > > > > > > > > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the > > message: > > > > > > > > > > > > INFO > > > > > > > > > > > > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access > > instructions, > > > > > > > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the > > message: INFO > > > > > > > > > > > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Jay Maynard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Jay Maynard > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access > > instructions, > > > > > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: > > INFO > > > > > > > > > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access > instructions, > > > > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: > INFO > > > > > > > > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO > > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Jay Maynard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO > > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO > > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jay Maynard > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > -- > Jay Maynard > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Jay Maynard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
