Have you verified that EDGUX100 is not being loaded/used? I read ALL of your
first post, and you specifically said
that EDGUX100 and UXTB had been converted. Sorry for not taking the time to
read ALL of your post :)
Current Data Set Allocation Member was found
Command ===> Scroll ===> CSR
Message Act DDname Data Set Name Actions: B E V M F C I Q
Member: EDGUX100 > LINKLIST SYS1.LINKLIB
> SYS1.MIGLIB
> SYS1.CSSLIB
"Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit."
Bugs Bunny
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 11:01 AM, rpinion865
<[email protected]> wrote:
> If you do a D SSI from the console do you see anything about UXTB?
>
> SUBSYS=UXTB
> DYNAMIC=YES STATUS=INACTIVE COMMANDS=REJECT
>
>
>
> "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit."
>
> Bugs Bunny
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
>
> On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 10:35 AM, Jay Maynard
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > It is in production. We get the EDGI100I message there, and yet things run
> > fine.
> >
> > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 9:34 AM rpinion865 <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like things have changed from the examples I shared. My examples
> > > come from an OS/390 2.10 system.
> > >
> > > A more modern z/OS talks about EDGDEFxx.
> > >
> > > https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=edgdefxx-converting-from-using-uxtable-using-defaults-table
> > >
> > > But you are seeing abends that are related to the UXTB. Do you know if
> > > the new functionality can run with
> > > the UXTB?
> > >
> > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit."
> > >
> > > Bugs Bunny
> > >
> > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> > >
> > > On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 10:24 AM, Jay Maynard <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is this still necessary if the same function is done in EDGDEF00,
> > > > though?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 9:16 AM rpinion865 <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I would search for something, might be run as job as opposed to a STC,
> > > > > that executes this.
> > > > >
> > > > > VIEW OS390.PROCLIB(EDGCVRSP) - 01.01 Columns 00001
> > > > > 00072
> > > > > Command ===> Scroll ===>
> > > > > CSR
> > > > > 000038 //LOADUXTB EXEC PGM=EDGCVRSL,REGION=4096K,PARM='&SSN.,&TAB.'
> > > > >
> > > > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit."
> > > > >
> > > > > Bugs Bunny
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 10:10 AM, rpinion865 <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Perhaps, the UXTB is being created with a STC that does not use the
> > > > > > IBM
> > > > > > EDG* name. From the system
> > > > > > where a UXTB is created, these are the messages you should see. The
> > > > > > EDGX102I message indicates the UXTB
> > > > > > has been created.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > STC32987 00000090 $HASP373 EDGCVRSP STARTED
> > > > > > STC32986 00000290 IEF695I START LMSINIT WITH JOBNAME LMSINIT IS
> > > > > > ASSIGNED
> > > > > > TO
> > > > > > , GROUP PROCGRP
> > > > > > STC32987 00000090 IEF403I EDGCVRSP - STARTED - TIME=11.31.16
> > > > > > STC32986 00000090 $HASP373 LMSINIT STARTED
> > > > > > STC32986 00000090 IEF403I LMSINIT - STARTED - TIME=11.31.16
> > > > > > 00000290 IEF196I IEF237I 0301 ALLOCATED TO SYS00002
> > > > > > STC32987 00000090 EDGX102I DATA TABLE LOADED O.K.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bugs Bunny
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 9:57 AM, Jay Maynard
> > > > > > [email protected] wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > EDGCVRSP, that is. And no, that doesn't exist either.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 8:54 AM Jay Maynard [email protected]
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The IBM webpage calls for that, in STC EDGVRSP. That started
> > > > > > > > task
> > > > > > > > proc
> > > > > > > > doesn't exist on either system.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 8:51 AM rpinion865 <
> > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think you need to run a DFRMM STC which will set up the
> > > > > > > > > UXTB.
> > > > > > > > > Off the
> > > > > > > > > top of my head, I cannot
> > > > > > > > > remember what STC does that. Maybe my suggestion will ring a
> > > > > > > > > bell
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > you. If not, I can find out
> > > > > > > > > what STC you need to run.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit."
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bugs Bunny
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 9:47 AM, Jay Maynard <
> > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We're having a weird problem. On our QA LPAR, trying to do a
> > > > > > > > > > tape mount
> > > > > > > > > > (for an FDRABR restore operation) results in the following
> > > > > > > > > > messages
> > > > > > > > > > after the IEF455D for the tape mount:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > EDGI100I SUBSYSTEM UXTB NOT DEFINED OR NO TABLE LOADED
> > > > > > > > > > EDG2003E ABEND S0C4 U0000 RSN 0017 DURING DFSMSrmm SUBSYSTEM
> > > > > > > > > > PROCESSING
> > > > > > > > > > AT
> > > > > > > > > > 4C0DFA IN MODULE K j~
> > > > > > > > > > EDG4003E DFSMSrmm DETECTED CONTROL BLOCK ERROR 20, 4084
> > > > > > > > > > DURING
> > > > > > > > > > OPEN FOR
> > > > > > > > > > VQ0002 BY TXNWABRR, UTABRRES, TAPE#
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Everything we can find about the EDGI100I message talks
> > > > > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > using
> > > > > > > > > > EDGUX100 to set up processing for tape expiration. We had,
> > > > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > point in
> > > > > > > > > > the past, had that exit in place and the associated table,
> > > > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > during
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > installation of a previous z/OS, converted that to using the
> > > > > > > > > > EDGDEF00 member to accomplish the same goal and removed the
> > > > > > > > > > exit
> > > > > > > > > > and the
> > > > > > > > > > table.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The annoying thing about this is that this all works
> > > > > > > > > > perfectly
> > > > > > > > > > in our
> > > > > > > > > > production LPAR. We've compared definitions and modules
> > > > > > > > > > between
> > > > > > > > > > the two
> > > > > > > > > > LPARs, and they're the same.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So...anyone have any suggestions as to where we can look?
> > > > > > > > > > Why
> > > > > > > > > > does RMM
> > > > > > > > > > issue EDGI100I if the exit is not in use? I've tried looking
> > > > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > the 0C4
> > > > > > > > > > dump, and it wasn't very enlightening. We've contacted BMC
> > > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > to make
> > > > > > > > > > sure it's not FDR that's the culprit, and they found that
> > > > > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > victim,
> > > > > > > > > > and pointed us to the same web page we keep tripping over at
> > > > > > > > > > https://ibm.com/support/pages/rmm-message-edgi100i-issued .
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Jay Maynard
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
> > > > > > > > > > instructions,
> > > > > > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message:
> > > > > > > > > > INFO
> > > > > > > > > > IBM-MAIN
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
> > > > > > > > > instructions,
> > > > > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> > > > > > > > > IBM-MAIN
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Jay Maynard
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Jay Maynard
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> > > > > > > IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> > > > > > IBM-MAIN
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jay Maynard
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > --
> > Jay Maynard
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
