Incorrect. Every time a program of mine ran, the company saved money and the 
executives got paid bonuses or salaries (often both) for my work.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Sunday, December 3, 2023, 3:01 PM, Bob Bridges <robhbrid...@gmail.com> wrote:

Interesting analogy.  But surely there's one obvious difference:  When an 
entertainment program runs, someone gets paid, and residuals mean whoever gets 
paid (by subscribers, say) has to share the receipts with the writers.  But 
when a company runs a program they own, they don't receive any money for it; 
it's just work getting done.

---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313

/* Our cause is never more in danger than when a human, no longer desiring, but 
still intending, to do our Enemy's will, looks round upon a universe from which 
every trace of Him seems to have vanished, and asks why he has been abandoned, 
and still obeys.  -advice to a tempter, from The Screwtape Letters by C S Lewis 
*/

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Dave Beagle
Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 14:17

I always thought this was something a union for IT workers would ask for in a 
contract. Why should actors get residuals every time a show runs and not the 
programmers every time their program runs? Written programs are every bit 
intellectual property as a TV program.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to