W dniu 31.08.2023 o 19:48, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 10:39:34 -0700, Tom Brennan wrote:
I thought ORDER= was done because you can code more than one dataset.
DD concatenation should have sufficed for that.
DD concatenation is better, because it may contain more entries. Yes,
ORDER parameter can be continued in next line, but it is much more error
prone than regular DD set.
DD is also better, because it can describe non-catalogued PDS(E)s.
I suspect the JCLLIB in that form was a way to force catalog as a must.
AFAIK it was introduced in MVS 4.1 along with IF/THEN/ELSE statements.
And TIME=NOLIMIT (not 1440).
Or maybe it was INCLUDE?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
