True, they could have done that. They could have also used //PROCLIB
and saved us some kludge coding :) Unless there was some concern about
getting sued by CA. Oh well, it's all history now.
On 8/31/2023 10:48 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 10:39:34 -0700, Tom Brennan wrote:
I thought ORDER= was done because you can code more than one dataset.
DD concatenation should have sufficed for that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
