Yes, but IBM would have given the same ABEND code had they done a READ CKD and compared.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Steve Thompson [ste...@wkyr.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 6:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Unlike data sets concatenation - revised Isn't this the result of a CCW that does not have the wrong length Record suppression bit on (I think that is what it is called, been a long time since I did any CCWs and SSCH commands). Steve Thompson On 4/26/2023 6:08 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:44:21 -0700, Michael Stein wrote: > >>> 000234D0 E6D9D5C7 4BD3C5D5 4BD9C5C3 D6D9C46B | WRNG.LEN.RECORD, >>> | >> A likely result from reading a block larger than the blksize. >> > Why does it say "RECORD" if it means "Block"? > >> ... >> What does the *SOURCE* DCB & JCL look like? Do either specify LRECL >> and/or BLKSIZE? >> > Just cut the Gordian Knot and specify the largest BLKSIZE expected; even > 32760. > LRECL likewise. Storage is cheap nowadays. > -- Regards, Steve Thompson VS Strategies LLC Westfield IN 972-983-9430 cell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
