+1 Storage is a lot cheaper than programmer time writing exits and bit-twiddling DCBs.
Isn't there a BUFL parameter that accomplishes the same thing and can be used without regard to actual BLKSIZE (in the case of RECFM=FB)? CM On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 17:08:54 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aol.com> wrote: >On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:44:21 -0700, Michael Stein wrote: > >>> 000234D0 E6D9D5C7 4BD3C5D5 4BD9C5C3 D6D9C46B | WRNG.LEN.RECORD, | >> >>A likely result from reading a block larger than the blksize. >> >Why does it say "RECORD" if it means "Block"? > >> ... >>What does the *SOURCE* DCB & JCL look like? Do either specify LRECL >>and/or BLKSIZE? >> >Just cut the Gordian Knot and specify the largest BLKSIZE expected; even 32760. >LRECL likewise. Storage is cheap nowadays. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
