John, What about //..... SET
Scott ford www.identityforge.com Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand. - Chinese Proverb On Mar 25, 2013, at 5:02 PM, John McKown <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah. I get you, now. I might try using the JCLLIB statement so that my > personal JCL proclib was "in front" of the system proclibs. Then put a > member in my proclib with the same name as used in the system proc for the > INCLUDE member. Like putting your own macro/copy library in front of the > system libraries in a compile. Clumsy, but it should override the system > version of the INCLUDE member. > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Bill Ashton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was planning to override an existing INCLUDE for a common set of STEPLIB >> files, but for different programs. I was hoping I wouldn't have to make a >> lot of changes to the JCL just for this simple test I am running. >> Billy >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:53 PM, John McKown >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I haven't seen any syntax to do that. Why not use a instream PROC? You >> can >>> now nest a PROC within another PROC, so you could use an instream PROC >> much >>> like an instream INCLUDE. >>> >>> //INSTREAM PROC >>> //STEP EXEC PGM=WANDA >>> //DD1 >>> // PEND >>> // EXEC PROC=EXTPROC,IPROC=INSTREAM >>> // >>> >>> //EXTPROC PROC IPROC= >>> // EXEC PROC=&IPROC >>> //* OTHER JCL IN EXTERNAL PROC IN PROCLIB >>> //* >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Bill Ashton <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Does anyone know if I can create an instream entry that would be used >> as >>> an >>>> INCLUDE? I have a bunch of steps in this job I am running, and would >> like >>>> to override the INCLUDE member being called by coding it instream in >> the >>>> top of the job, just as you would do with an instream PROC. I don't >> want >>> to >>>> change the JCLLIB, as it is pretty complex already. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> *Billy Ashton* >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an >>> actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? >>> >>> Maranatha! <>< >>> John McKown >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> >> >> -- >> Thank you and best regards, >> *Billy Ashton* >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an > actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
