Ah. I get you, now. I might try using the JCLLIB statement so that my personal JCL proclib was "in front" of the system proclibs. Then put a member in my proclib with the same name as used in the system proc for the INCLUDE member. Like putting your own macro/copy library in front of the system libraries in a compile. Clumsy, but it should override the system version of the INCLUDE member.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Bill Ashton <[email protected]> wrote: > I was planning to override an existing INCLUDE for a common set of STEPLIB > files, but for different programs. I was hoping I wouldn't have to make a > lot of changes to the JCL just for this simple test I am running. > Billy > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:53 PM, John McKown > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I haven't seen any syntax to do that. Why not use a instream PROC? You > can > > now nest a PROC within another PROC, so you could use an instream PROC > much > > like an instream INCLUDE. > > > > //INSTREAM PROC > > //STEP EXEC PGM=WANDA > > //DD1 > > // PEND > > // EXEC PROC=EXTPROC,IPROC=INSTREAM > > // > > > > //EXTPROC PROC IPROC= > > // EXEC PROC=&IPROC > > //* OTHER JCL IN EXTERNAL PROC IN PROCLIB > > //* > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Bill Ashton <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Does anyone know if I can create an instream entry that would be used > as > > an > > > INCLUDE? I have a bunch of steps in this job I am running, and would > like > > > to override the INCLUDE member being called by coding it instream in > the > > > top of the job, just as you would do with an instream PROC. I don't > want > > to > > > change the JCLLIB, as it is pretty complex already. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > *Billy Ashton* > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an > > actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? > > > > Maranatha! <>< > > John McKown > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > -- > Thank you and best regards, > *Billy Ashton* > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
