On IBM TS7700 R4 the maximum quantity of feature #5268, 100 MBps
Throughput, is increased to 39 when 16 Gbps FICON adapter features #3402 or
#3403 are installed.
So throughput will max out at 4,000 MBps.

On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 22:58, Jackson, Rob <rwjack...@firsthorizon.com>
wrote:

> We have a three-way TS7760 grid--all mirrors of each other.  DR box is a
> TS7760T with a 3584, with some 650 tapes, or so.
>
> Yes, it's very much different.  With IBM's VTSs you pay for bandwidth.  We
> license 300 MB/s, for instance, on each cluster.  If I remember correctly,
> you can go up to 700 MB/s on the TS7760.  A far cry from normal "DASD"
> boxes.
>
> First Horizon Bank
> Mainframe Technical Support
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf
> Of kekronbekron
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 10:47 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Storage & tape question
>
> [External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or opening
> attachments.]
>
> Hmm... do a lot of shops use actual cart based tapes ... TS77xx with
> TS4x00?
> Don't know if EMC DLm has a cart back-end option.
>
> If it's VTL with disk back-end, is that any different from having it all
> on DASD?
>
>
> - KB
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Monday, July 6, 2020 4:25 PM, R.S. <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl>
> wrote:
>
> > I forgot something obvious for me: NEVER USE TAPES FOR APPLICATION DATA.
> > No jobs should write or read tapes.
> > Nothing except backup and restore and (optionally) ML2. Managed by HSM
> > or FDR. Some excepions for archive copies are worth to consider.
> > Note: you may have 15 years old backup on new shining tape. Migration
> > from older tape is no nightmare at all. It is simple.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------------
> >
> > Radoslaw Skorupka
> > Lodz, Poland
> >
> > W dniu 06.07.2020 o 12:49, R.S. pisze:
> >
> > > W dniu 05.07.2020 o 14:12, kekronbekron pisze:
> > >
> > > > Hello List,
> > > > Just wondering ... assuming there's a primary storage product out
> > > > there that can store how-many-ever hoo-haa-bytes, and is a good
> > > > product in general, it should make sense to begin eliminating all
> > > > tape (3490/3590) use right?
> > > > First, ML1 & ML2 in HSM, then HSM itself, then rebuild jobs to
> > > > write to disk, or do SMS/ACS updates to make it all disk
> reads/writes.
> > > > Looking at the current storage solutions out there, this is
> > > > possible, right?
> > > > What would be the drawbacks (assume that primary storage is super
> > > > cost-efficient, so there's no need to archive anything).
> > >
> > > Few remarks:
> > > Even the cheapest possible DASD will not replace backup and other
> > > things (archive copy, etc.) I did replace 3490E tapes with really
> > > cheap second hand DASD boxes, it was approx. 20 years ago. Been
> > > There, done that. It wasn't very fine solution, it was cheap and
> > > working. AFAIR HSM does not like DASD as the output for some
> > > activities, can't remember details.
> > > Someone wrote about tapes moved to DR shelter. That's very
> > > old-fashioned. I would strongly prefer to have remote copy, that
> > > means two dasd-boxes and connectivity between.
> > > There are products for tape emulation on CKD disk. It is definitely
> > > no cheap. It also consume MSU.
> > > Tapes, even virtual tapes are OFFLINE media from MVS point of view.
> > > Offline media are good for some oooops! mistakes.
> > > Last, but not least: you assumption is far from reality. DASD is
> > > still more expensive than tape. The more capacity the difference is
> bigger.
> > > Tape (real one) is cheap when talking about carts and very well
> > > scalable. However tape realm with "first cart" is extremely
> > > expensive, because drives are expensive, controllers are expensive
> > > and ATLs are expensive.
> > > The real decision depends strongly on your capacity, your predicted
> > > growths, your needs and budget.
> >
> > ==
> >
> > Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:
> >
> > -   powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
> > -   usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub
> zapisałeś na dysku).
> >     Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może
> wykorzystać tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia
> (kopiuje, rozprowadza) tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania,
> narusza prawo i może podlegać karze.
> >
> >     mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950
> Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st.
> Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS
> 0000025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości)
> według stanu na 01.01.2020 r. wynosi 169.401.468 złotych.
> >
> >     If you are not the addressee of this message:
> >
> > -   let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
> > -   delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you
> have printed out or saved).
> >     This message may contain legally protected information, which may be
> used exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who
> disseminates (copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar
> action, violates the law and may be penalised.
> >
> >     mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18,
> 00-950 Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court
> for the Capital City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National
> Court Register, KRS 0000025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share
> capital amounting to PLN 169.401.468 as at 1 January 2020.
> >
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> Confidentiality notice:
> This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally
> privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended
> recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this
> message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail message is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately
> notify the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to