On 16 April 2012 13:35, John Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > I even object, but not much, to > > |.trvend anop , > > I supply the missing-operand comma for anop, mexit, etc., only when I > want to place a comment after it.
I've found that the risk of later copying (by me or someone else) of such a code segment, and then putting in update markers toward the right of the input field - typically in the mid to high 60s column positions - makes it worth while to always put in the comma. There are a very few IBM macros, but to my knowledge no assembler statements, that have trouble with this, and they must be handled individually. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
