In <[email protected]>, on 04/16/2012
at 05:57 PM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> said:
>But with GOTOless programming the logic is easier to read.
Except when it's harder. The real issue is structuring the code so
that it's easier to read and maintain, not blindly following a
theological dictum. If that requires more goto statements then I'll
cheerfully use them. Read "Structured Programming Using goto" (I'm not
sure of the spelling.)
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
