On 4/16/2012 1:35 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
I even object, but not much, to
|.trvend anop ,
I supply the missing-operand comma for anop, mexit, etc., only when I
want to place a comment after it.
These, however, are details that are important only as they contribute
to coherence.
The comma is a result of a personal(?) idiosyncrasy. Since the
late sixties, I have used columns 65-71 to indicate code changes
(author,date); this practice permits detailed identification of
modifications that may not be as obvious when provided as
paragraph or program comments. Omitting the comma results in
assembly errors.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
