On 4/10/2012 1:54 PM, Phil Smith wrote:
Steve Comstock wrote:
Yes. But that's Assembler. I thought the called routine
was C, and you were testing the parms passed in the C
routine. Is that not true? Are there more layers here?
Yes, there are lots of layers, it's a mixture of assembler and C, sorry. The
point is, we're confident that the description of the behavior we've seen is as
described (we have XDC, too, so can see some of it). it's very strange-as if
nobody at IBM ever really tried to use variable plists with PL/I!
Slipperier and slipperier. OK, let's try a different approach:
You tell me exactly what you want to see from the PL/I routine calling
your API and I'll see if I can cause PL/I to construct that.
In other words, your routine will see
(R1) -> ????????
--
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-355-2752
http://www.trainersfriend.com
* To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment!
+ Training your people is an excellent investment
* Try our tool for calculating your Return On Investment
for training dollars at
http://www.trainersfriend.com/ROI/roi.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
