Steve Comstock wrote: > Yes. But that's Assembler. I thought the called routine >was C, and you were testing the parms passed in the C >routine. Is that not true? Are there more layers here?
Yes, there are lots of layers, it's a mixture of assembler and C, sorry. The point is, we're confident that the description of the behavior we've seen is as described (we have XDC, too, so can see some of it). it's very strange-as if nobody at IBM ever really tried to use variable plists with PL/I! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
