Why? I don't understand this comment, because JCL parm is always only
one parm;
no variable length address list ... what do I get wrong? Well, the JCL
parm itself has
variable length, but the length of the address list is fixed, always
one. And: I dont know
if the system sets the high order bit of the address of the JCL parm - I
just don't care.
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 18.04.2012 01:06, schrieb Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.):
In<[email protected]>,
on 04/11/2012
at 12:32 PM, "McKown, John"<[email protected]> said:
Given all the above facts, I wonder if it is time to abandon, in
our own code, the practice of indicating end-of-list by setting
the high order bit of the last parameter to '1'b.
Perhaps for new subroutines, but certainly not for anything intended
to be invoked from JCL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
