In article <[email protected]> you write:
>On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:35:55 -0800, Edward Jaffe  wrote:
>
>>On 2/26/2012 3:29 PM, Rich Greenberg wrote:
>>>> Inserting a Reply-To: header by the Listserv is an option that must be
>>>> turned on.
>>
>>Rich, you're discussing a different problem.

Aparantly I am.  I missed the "In".
Sorry about that.

>>It's not the Reply-To: tag that is missing; it's the In-Reply-To: tag that is
>>missing.

I am unaware of the "rules" that control that tag.

-- 
Rich Greenberg  Sarasota, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com  + 1 941 378 2097
Eastern time.  N6LRT  I speak for myself & my dogs only.    VM'er since CP-67
Canines: Val,Red,Shasta,Zero,Casey & Cinnar (At the bridge)   Owner:Chinook-L
Canines: Red & Max (Siberians)     Retired at the beach  Asst Owner:Sibernet-L

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to