In article <[email protected]> you write: >On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:33 -0500, Rich Greenberg wrote: > >>In article you write: >>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:01:36 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>>>>What I see is that the requisite "In-Reply-To:" header element, necessary to >>>>properly thread messages together, is missing from your responses. Is there >>>>any >>>>way to fix that? [snip] >Are you perhaps addressing a different problem from the problem >(or non-problem, in your perception) that Ed reported? Gil et al, I don't think so, but upon re-reading Ed's query, I see that I could have been more specific in my reply. /confession: I used a canned post that has been posted to the list several times over the years when this topic has come up. Inserting a Reply-To: header by the Listserv is an option that must be turned on. I think it is turned on, but have no way to verify this. Its also an option to respect or ignore an existing Reply-To: header. If a followup is made directly to usenet, its presence depends on the newsreader used and I think the default is NO. -- Rich Greenberg Sarasota, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 941 378 2097 Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67 Canines: Val,Red,Shasta,Zero,Casey & Cinnar (At the bridge) Owner:Chinook-L Canines: Red & Max (Siberians) Retired at the beach Asst Owner:Sibernet-L ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
