On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:35:55 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote: >On 2/26/2012 3:29 PM, Rich Greenberg wrote: >>> Inserting a Reply-To: header by the Listserv is an option that must be >>> turned on. > >Rich, you're discussing a different problem. > >It's not the Reply-To: tag that is missing; it's the In-Reply-To: tag that is >missing. > Yes. Perhaps Rich has (or emulates) a 'bot that scans for the SUBstring "Reply-To:" and submits his canned message.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
