OK, I know about IEBUPDTE. I guess that is needed for source code updates. Personally, I prefer the UNIX patch command. OCO has decreased the need for source updates. JES and PARMLIB members are all that come to mind.
Please forgive spelling errors. I'm not using my work email anymore. I'm using my Android cell phone from now on. Change in email rules at work. -- John McKown Maranatha! <>< Sent from my Vibrant Android phone. On May 3, 2011 9:17 AM, "Don Leahy" <[email protected]> wrote: Perhaps he is referring to IEBUPDTE? I don't know of anyone who maintains code that way, but there might be someone out there who does. Personally, I have been campaigning against the use of sequence numbers in Cobol programs for years. On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:03, John McKown <[email protected] >wrote: > Then explain them to this poor fool. I find them to be a useless > anachronism. And your answers ... > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at ht... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http:/... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
