> > issue the STORAGE OBTAIN in SP=241 yourself. Then issue the LOAD, pointing > to that area > > Thanks. I had decided to ask about that. Sounds like less of a re-write than > going from LOAD to CSVDYLPA. The load module is small (a little over 1K) and > fairly stable. I already have an SP=241 area that I could easily enlarge by > 1K+. Any negatives to this approach? Any reason not to do it this way?
CSVDYLPA will create a CDE so that things like IPCS WHERE and SLIP can identify the module name. LOAD to address will not create a CDE. For that reason, I strongly recommend CSVDYLPA over LOAD to address. Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
