For a flat object viewed straight-on you need rectilinear output projection.
Five control points should be enough, but my question is, did you move the camera between shots? Hugin can stitch this, but it is not a 'normal' panorama, so you need to use what Hugin calls a 'mosaic' technique where you optimise the camera positions. Can you upload the photos? I'm sure someone here can show you how it's done. Yes there are problems with Wayland, but it depends entirely how wxwidgets has been built, so it varies between Linux distributions. -- Bruno On Thu, 20 Mar 2025, 09:49 Nick Thomas wrote: > I am attempting to stitch images of the Dunfallandy Stone > <https://i0.wp.com/sobt.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Dunfallandy-Stone-1.jpg?resize=768%2C1024&ssl=1>. > I have three images, the top, middle and bottom of the stone taken with a > Nikkor 14-24mm lens, set at 14mm. > > When I try to align the images, no control points are found. I have > manually added 5 CP on each pair of images. > > The thing that I am now unsure of is what projection to use. I have tried > a number (fish eye, equisolid, orthographic, amongst others), but all give > me a huge amount of distortion on the final image. > > My questions are: > > 1. Are 5 CP sufficient? > 2. What projection should I use for a stitch of 3 vertical images? > > As an aside, I am finding that Hugin seems to be flaky when run over a > KDE/Wayland/Nvidia driver for an Nvidia graphics card. The problems go away > when I use X11 rather than Wayland. > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAJV99Zi3UcJMQ5yWt4rKMc0eip0skEKtLtLSDXxyJ%3D%3Dh5K37Vg%40mail.gmail.com.
