----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hardy Ferentschik" <ha...@hibernate.org> > To: "Gail Badner" <gbad...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Hibernate hibernate-dev" <hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org> > Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 4:39:31 AM > Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Unit test failures using the new metamodel > > > On 3 Jan 2012, at 10:14 AM, Gail Badner wrote > > > I've pushed a commit that takes care of these and changes the > > default for both flags to true. > > Cool, even though I would have expected that the build completes > after the push. Anyways, ... > > > VersionedLobTest.testVersionUnchangedByteArray is marked as > > @FailureExpected but it incorrectly passes using the new > > metamodel, so you'll see this test failing now due to > > FailureExpectedHandler$FailureExpectedTestPassedException. > > This one beats me. What do you mean it passes incorrectly? Switching > to the new metamodel the test passes which would indicate to me > that this test was fixed as a side effect of all metamodel work. If > you are saying it passes wrongly, then the test itself must be based > on wrong > assertions. What is it?
I am not convinced that the metamodel work fixes this. I could be wrong, but AFAIK, HHH-5811 is still an issue. I can see where the assertions can be indeterminate. I've pushed a commit to make them determinate. It still passes with the new model, but fails with the old metadata (with -Dhibernate.test.new_metadata_mappings=false -Dhibernate.test.validatefailureexpected=true). My preference would be to keep @FailureExpected on this test, but I know this starts to complicate when we add/remove annotations. Hopefully, if it really should fail, we'll find out soon when more work is done. > > > In addition, these tests fail: > > > > Test org.hibernate.test.annotations.interfaces.InterfacesTest > > FAILED > > Test > > org.hibernate.test.annotations.idmanytoone.alphabetical.AlphabeticalIdManyToOneTest > > FAILED > > Test > > org.hibernate.test.naturalid.mutable.cached.CachedMutableNaturalIdTest > > FAILED > > As I said before, the problem is that > @FailureExpectedWithNewMetamodel is not honored by > BaseCoreFunctionalTestCase when > an error occurs in the setup (BeforeClass handlers). We could try to > address this in BaseCoreFunctionalTestCase, but in this case I > decided > to move BaseAnnotationBindingTestCase into the testing module and > make it the base class for these tests. I was using this base class > for > testing some annotation based binding tests and it is imo much more > suitable for the tests above. Thanks for addressing the tests using annotations. > > Right now we have the hibernate-core module passing with the new > metamodel enabled and the expected failures validated. Hopefully we > can > keep it this way. I chatted with Strong about CachedMutableNaturalIdTest.testChangedNaturalIdNotCachedAfterTransactionFailure and it really does look like a regression. It should work with the new metamodel so, IMO, it should not be annotated with @FailureExpectedWithNewMetamodel. He said he would look into it. Gail > > --Hardy _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev