On 9 sept. 2010, at 12:45, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > Final provoking thought, why is it so important to switch to Lucene 3? > couldn't we support both, and have people try to understand that if > they want backwards compatibility they should use Lucene 2.9 and if > they want Lucene 3 they won't be able to use Solr analyzers, pointing > to the fact that a compatible Solr wasn't released yet?
Sorry for the long sleep. I don't think it is realistic to dismiss Solr analyzers like that. I find There is too much value in the declarative analyzer framework as well as the various filters and tokenizers these guys provide. _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
