On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:17:51 +0200, Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So we still load the class, and also try to invoke it's default > constructor, but if we fail we try loading the alternative. Ok, and that implies that we actually rename the "alternative" implementations. I guess this could work as well. It might be the best solution in case we go for the renaming of packages, but I am still not convinced that we should go for it (the renaming). _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
