So some databases can't be accessed from JDK 6? That sucks. I guess the question is from the people that can't go for JDK 6 / JDBC 4, how many are willing to move to the next version of Hibernate anyway. If it's a small minority, we should move on. If not then we need to hack around :(
On 22 sept. 09, at 19:36, Steve Ebersole wrote: > JDBC 4 is JDK 1.6, correct. > > Because not all deployment environments support jdk 1.6 nor do all > jdbc > drivers support jdbc 4 > > > On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 19:07 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >> Actually naive question. >> JDBC 4 is JDK 6 right. Since JDK 5 is EOLed at the end of this month, >> Why don't we just stop JDBC 3 support altogether? >> >> On 22 sept. 09, at 18:19, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >> >>> from how I understand Maven, swallow it and go for 2. >>> >>> On 21 sept. 09, at 20:53, Steve Ebersole wrote: >>> >>>> http://in.relation.to/12371.lace >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> >>>> Hibernate.org >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > -- > Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> > Hibernate.org > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
