JDBC 4 is JDK 1.6, correct. Because not all deployment environments support jdk 1.6 nor do all jdbc drivers support jdbc 4
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 19:07 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > Actually naive question. > JDBC 4 is JDK 6 right. Since JDK 5 is EOLed at the end of this month, > Why don't we just stop JDBC 3 support altogether? > > On 22 sept. 09, at 18:19, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > > > from how I understand Maven, swallow it and go for 2. > > > > On 21 sept. 09, at 20:53, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > > >> http://in.relation.to/12371.lace > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> -- > >> Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> > >> Hibernate.org > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> hibernate-dev mailing list > >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > hibernate-dev mailing list > > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev -- Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> Hibernate.org _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
