Hi,
On 4/7/26 09:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello!
It’s getting heated here. :-)
Sorry, didn't see your message this morning.
Greg Hogan <[email protected]> skribis:
the use of AI do need to present a compelling case and reach
consensus.
I’ve been working on a GCD on this topic, which I plan to submit once
GCD 6 and 7 are out of the way.
Good to hear! Thanks.
In the meantime, I think the improvised “debate” here, and the harsh
words that come with it, is probably best put on hold.
Maybe you are right. Yet I also feel that it is good to have some
conversations before having a GCD, to learn what the different ideas
actually are.
I'm apparently one of the people more open to using LLMs, but I'm also
open to the criticism. I would currently not be able to argue in favor
of my position, as I have not even settled what my position is. These
discussions do help with clarifying my thoughts, and learn the views of
others.
The GCD process maybe is supposed to be that conversation though.
I'll trust your judgement and shut up.
Hugo
