no-re...@cfengine.com writes: > This is one of the main reasons that we are being very careful about > this. Anything that has the "CFEngine stamp of approval" on it needs > to be top quality. We are putting together some guidelines for how > this will work, to find a balance between comprehensiveness, agility > and quality. Community peer-review, as Neil says, will play an > important role in it.
I'm a bit sceptical to cfengine.com taking responsibility for a site like this. It may lead to too much control and quality assurance on part of cfengine.com, for fear of customers complaining that examples etc. on the site don't work for them, i.e. "You published it, you fix it". > I'll post some of the general ideas once we have them in a more > concrete form. Looking forward to it, and I hope you prove my statements above wrong :) It is very important to have a low threshold for publishing stuff on such a site, to encourage the community to participate. On the other hand, quality is also important. Finding the right balance can be a challenge. I agree with Neil about community peer-review. This can eliminate cfengine.com becoming a bottleneck for quality assurance. But if done wrong, it may become a bottleneck in itself. Again, it is a question of finding the right balance. Cheers, -- Trond H. Amundsen <t.h.amund...@usit.uio.no> Center for Information Technology Services, University of Oslo _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
