On 27 nov 2010, at 16:40, Daniel V. Klein wrote: > The problem that I see with this is that it turns Cfengine into more of a > "push" technology. By defining a class, you're still letting the remote > agent set the policy, but by saying "run this bundle", you're bordering on > setting the policy remotely... >
That is just one of the strengths of cfengine. That there is also a "push" model. Why frequently use this to install security fixes and put our cluster in Maintenance mode. why not let the people decide if they want to use the "push" model and i agree with Seva proposal. > On Nov 26, 2010, at 6:29 PM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote: > >> Forum: Cfengine Help >> Subject: Re: what if cf-runagent could be able to call just one bundle from >> the bundlesequence? >> Author: neilhwatson >> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19442,19444#msg-19444 >> >> Could be useful. Can you think of any cases where calling a single bundle >> might cause problem? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Help-cfengine mailing list >> Help-cfengine@cfengine.org >> https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine > > _______________________________________________ > Help-cfengine mailing list > Help-cfengine@cfengine.org > https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine -- Bas van der Vlies b...@sara.nl _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
