I agree - cf-runagent should be able to pass through the -b option to cf-agent, in the same way -D is passed through. Except that -b already has a different meaning to cf-runagent...
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:21 AM, <no-re...@cfengine.com> wrote: > Forum: Cfengine Help > Subject: what if cf-runagent could be able to call just one bundle from the > bundlesequence? > Author: Seva Gluschenko > Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19442,19442#msg-19442 > > I bet it would be really nice feature to have the straighforward possibility > to call just one bundle from the formerly defined bundlesequence using > cf-runagent. It often gets useful to apply some specific changes to a server > o a cluster more or less momentarily, much more fast than it's possible doing > the complete bundlesequence. > > Of course, it's achievable right now by defining different bundlesequences > for different classes and defining the appropriate class during cf-runagent > invocation, but let's face the truth: the more sophisticated setup you get, > the harder it becomes to maintain. > > What do developers think? What does community think? > > _______________________________________________ > Help-cfengine mailing list > Help-cfengine@cfengine.org > https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine > _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
