On 08/12/14 15:10, Cédric Krier wrote:
On 08 Dec 12:34, Oscar Alvarez wrote:
On 08/12/14 04:35, Luis Falcon wrote:
Hi Chris !
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 19:49:00 -0800
Chris <s...@riseup.net> wrote:
I think there are reasons to develop both. With good, robust design
(like with Bootstrap), webapp UX on a mobile device is great, so the
flask-tryton is awesome (and the other flask addons that make
UX/webapp design easy). However, there are some bonuses to an Android
app. For example, asynchronous interactions (e.g., poor-connectivity
environments) is somewhat easier, I think, to develop in Android.
Nevertheless, got an Android developer on hand? I think an Android
app would be great then. =-)
Why limits this development to Android?
I propose does not limit to Android App, because it is great efforts take
advantage just for one OS (Not all people use Android), I believe that
instead App cross-plattform is right way, compatible with Android,
Blackberry, IOS, Windows Phone, Sailfish OS, Ubuntu Touch in future :( ,
today is nice possible with Qt + QML + Javascript (bye, bye slow Java).
Remember Qt tagline "Qt is most powerful way to develop cross-plattform
mobile apps" [1] and "Write once, compile everywhere."
[1] http://www.qt.io/
Still HTML5 application is more portable. For example, I can not run
your test program on my FirefoxOS while I can run any HTML5 application.
And I think FirefoxOS is realy an important target for GNU Healt as it
is used for cheap devices [1]
[1] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/os/devices/
Yes, you are right html5 is better than Qt, but what do you think about
build on Apache Cordova [1]?
[1] http://cordova.apache.org/
and I am sure if when you talk about web client is just sao (running
inside a web browser), and phones it requires open web browser?
or sao is just for desktop web client and using sao base code build
phone app?
