Hi Cedric On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:13:00 +0100 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com> wrote:
> On 08 Dec 09:32, Luis Falcon wrote: > > One of the points that we should also consider is the ability of > > being connectionless, so we could store data locally (in the > > device) and then synchronize it with the central instance. > > It needs to be clearly defined what are the scenario of > "connectionless". > For example, you don't want the mobile device to have all the database > stored locally. So "connectionless" means few things that can be done. > For example, it could be that if you try to save a form and there is > no connection then the form is stored locally to be submitted later. > But creating new record is much more complicate, you can not have the > same form in connecting and not connecting mode because some checks or > on_change can not be done. > I really thing that such "connectionless" application can not be a > subset of the Tryton's form. They can only be application on their own > for a specific use case. When thinking about the Android app, the idea was to have an application on its own. Something quite basic that allow to take simple samples and then send it to the server . I agree that the amount of data and functionality should be limited and specific. >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
