On 08 Dec 12:34, Oscar Alvarez wrote: > > On 08/12/14 04:35, Luis Falcon wrote: > >Hi Chris ! > >On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 19:49:00 -0800 > >Chris <s...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > >>I think there are reasons to develop both. With good, robust design > >>(like with Bootstrap), webapp UX on a mobile device is great, so the > >>flask-tryton is awesome (and the other flask addons that make > >>UX/webapp design easy). However, there are some bonuses to an Android > >>app. For example, asynchronous interactions (e.g., poor-connectivity > >>environments) is somewhat easier, I think, to develop in Android. > >>Nevertheless, got an Android developer on hand? I think an Android > >>app would be great then. =-) > Why limits this development to Android? > > I propose does not limit to Android App, because it is great efforts take > advantage just for one OS (Not all people use Android), I believe that > instead App cross-plattform is right way, compatible with Android, > Blackberry, IOS, Windows Phone, Sailfish OS, Ubuntu Touch in future :( , > today is nice possible with Qt + QML + Javascript (bye, bye slow Java). > > Remember Qt tagline "Qt is most powerful way to develop cross-plattform > mobile apps" [1] and "Write once, compile everywhere." > > [1] http://www.qt.io/
Still HTML5 application is more portable. For example, I can not run your test program on my FirefoxOS while I can run any HTML5 application. And I think FirefoxOS is realy an important target for GNU Healt as it is used for cheap devices [1] [1] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/os/devices/ -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgp89eFy4EiGR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
