Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
>> Before exploring this possibility, a little doubt,
>> is Qt runtime enough for materializing an .exe to be
>> build with hbIDE ?
>
> Yes.
>
If this is the case then we do not need complete run-time
of Qt. Only 4 dll's matching the version we compiled
hbQT* is enough. Can we embed them in our nightly zips ?
This way it will ensure that there is no mismatch.
> We made the decision at the beginning that only HBQT
> lib depends on QT headers, so the only occasion you
> need QT headers is when building HBQT. If you ship
> HBQT as binary (f.e. in Harbour binary distro), there
> is no need for them.
>
> Same goes for HBXBP.
>
> There is only one thing to pay attention to: QT runtime
> .dlls should match the version of QT headers used
> for building HBQT libs. Probably a major+minor
> match is enough, so 4.5.x .dlls should have matching
> HBQT libs built with 4.5.x, and 4.6.x .dlls matching
> with 4.6.x HBQT libs.
>
And it is respected.
No Qt header is called from application code.
-----
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
http://hbide.vouch.info/
--
View this message in context:
http://harbour-devel.1590103.n2.nabble.com/Qt-Distribution-Licensing-Clarification-tp5121732p5121950.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
