Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
>> This has what relation to my query ?
>
> I guess it's in relation to avoid a non-official distro
> for the sake of HBQT.
>
Probably.
> Proper solution would be to detach HBQT/HBXBP/HBIDE
> release schedule from core and make them available as
> a normal extra component which plugs into Harbour core
> distribution. (which should be created separately)
>
Ok.
So how can one obtain the latest binaries including
hbQT, hbXBP, hbIDE ? Nightly zips ?
I also find it really cumbersome to package everything
in one for sake of _out-of-the-box_ scenario.
> As for QT libs, I don't know, but to me packaging
> everything but the kitchen sink together just to save
> one official download and official installation of QT
> component look like a very bad idea, even if it's legal.
>
It is bad I know, but what if they do not have any interest in Qt.
225 MB vs 12 MB is a huge difference. We only need
4 .a files for this purpose.
I do not want to die their interest.
-----
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
http://hbide.vouch.info/
--
View this message in context:
http://harbour-devel.1590103.n2.nabble.com/Qt-Distribution-Licensing-Clarification-tp5121732p5121857.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
