Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> 
> So you went along and implemented what I intentionally 
> didn't want to implement.
> 
> If time is a factor for you and you cannot wait to 
> find the proper solution, pls keep above patch local 
> to your system.
> 

Of course, local.



> I don't agree with such feature, as I already told.
> IMHO it's wrong direction and really only helps to 
> confuse users and create overcomplicated projects.
> Also, this solution slows down compilation process 
> greatly, effectively nilling one of my major goals 
> for developing hbmk2.
> 
> Moreover, if someone wants to do this (per source 
> options), there are other, already working ways to 
> solve it. (f.e. defines, and pragmas). This are 
> make-system agnostic, part of the source code, thus 
> much better.
> 

#pragma could be a solution and have tested and works ok.
So this part is now fine with me.

One test point to other anomaly when including #pragma 
directive in the source is that its value is retained for rest of the 
files too. For example, #prgma /N- is first source is effective for 
the next sources too. 

The workaround is : group sources as such that later prgs 
should include prgmas which can descend to next groups.
This issue also has to be addressed.



>> Now I am pressing hbMK2 and hbIDE for the job, but here it seems a 
>> show-stopper unless I tweak hbMK2 to suit our purpose ( which 
>> from the core of my heart, I do not want ). Currently it is a
>> show-stopper
>> for this application to be hooked into hbIDE.
> 
> We still cannot see what is the problem.
> 
> As a start I cannot see how can you get 
> a warning at all when using -w0.
> 
> Pls provide a reduced example.
> 

It cannot be reduced as a self-reduced as the warnings 
are issued with really large sources written in sephgetti styles.



-----
     enjoy hbIDEing...
        Pritpal Bedi 
http://hbide.vouch.info/
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://harbour-devel.1590103.n2.nabble.com/hbMK2-xhb-issues-switch-n-by-default-which-breaks-process-tp5005754p5017497.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to