> Well I did some experiments and here I get the solution ( though temporary ) > until the issue is resolved: > > hbmk2.prg [ #3972 ] > > #if 1 /* Original */ [snip] > #if 0 > next > #endif
So you went along and implemented what I intentionally didn't want to implement. If time is a factor for you and you cannot wait to find the proper solution, pls keep above patch local to your system. > This also opens up some interesting possibilities. > For example, xMate accepts compiler switches per indivisual file basis. > This feature alone has helped our institution to be on the target quickly. I don't agree with such feature, as I already told. IMHO it's wrong direction and really only helps to confuse users and create overcomplicated projects. Also, this solution slows down compilation process greatly, effectively nilling one of my major goals for developing hbmk2. Moreover, if someone wants to do this (per source options), there are other, already working ways to solve it. (f.e. defines, and pragmas). This are make-system agnostic, part of the source code, thus much better. > Now I am pressing hbMK2 and hbIDE for the job, but here it seems a > show-stopper unless I tweak hbMK2 to suit our purpose ( which > from the core of my heart, I do not want ). Currently it is a show-stopper > for this application to be hooked into hbIDE. We still cannot see what is the problem. As a start I cannot see how can you get a warning at all when using -w0. Pls provide a reduced example. Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
