> Hi Viktor!
> 
> An remote client connects (command line app or not) on hbnetiosrv he
> needs must know the IP, port and password on our server. I say that
> already exists at this point a certain level of security (even though
> very little) in this respect.

Yes, as you say very little. These things are not that 
much of a problem if the server is running inside a LAN 
protected from the outside (typical for hbnetiosrv), but 
for any server that gets opened to the internet, it's 
highly unsafe. Remember that now we have only _one_ password 
which protects the only one data connection that exist, 
and using the same password for data connection and admin 
connection is already a big security problem, even for 
a local network with many users. It can be solved, 
but it needs effort.

> Now I understand your point of view and you're right. But I believe we
> dont have to worry about this right now.

If we will be lucky to have GTNET in the future, 
at least I'll have to deal with these (at least if 
I need the comfort of built-in remote control). Since 
GTNET will happily run via slow internet connections, 
too.

BTW, we will also need to deal with this if we want 
to convert (= run) either hbnetiosrv or hbgtsrv to/as 
a daemon or Windows service. This is the only way 
to control such "headless" setups.

Brgds,
Viktor

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to