Yes, it's a good idea. In this suggestion is good think also to all harbour server service like hbnetiosrv.prg trm_srv.prg and the upcoming gtnet or httpsrv.prg
IMO will be good also Having a Unificate server service : hbsrv:=hbnetiosrv.prg + trm_srv.prg + httpsrv.prg+gtnet when ready with a ini for define what task activate will help spread harbour over ip having a Unique application_dabatase server application ready to run in bin This is my 2 cent 2010/1/25 Vailton Renato <vail...@gmail.com>: > Hi Viktor! > > Looking from this perspective it may be unnecessary that kind of protection. > > And while we're on this subject: one idea I have studied is the > comparison of hbnetiosrv with other servers such as MySQL and > PostgreSQL and I think we could have a full server and a command line > client with all the options we have done so far. How could we do, for > example, if we need to remotely monitor the status of a server > hbnetiosrv? If we have a thin client could connect and do exactly what > we need to inform only the data from remote connection ... what do you > think? > > Regards, > Vailton Renato -- Massimo Belgrano _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
