Hi David,
For hbpp.exe fail but not for harbour.exe, hbrun.exe, hbtest.exe, ...
For hbpp.exe are missing ..\..\bin\os2 review/creation, as shown in
make_gnu.log:
Okay, I see now what is the problem, will attempt a fix.
>BTW, I've found a GNU Make 3.81 different from your builds,
>maybe you can give it a go and we can include it in SVN, if
>it works out okay. This way that we'd only need to concentrate
>on one GNU Make version.
>I've uploaded it here (along with some GNU tools, which may
>also help creating rules):
>http://www.syenar.hu/harbour/download/os2.zip
26/05/06 9:03p 115,200 0 a--- make.exe381
26/05/06 8:49p 241,668 0 a--- make.exevszakats
As you can see date are same but size are very different and both
report same version message
A fresh Harbour build with both make.exe show exactly same behaviour
and results
I discarded tests with make376 due problems with inner dir
separators as explained earlier
Is time to discard make376 and use only make381.
But which of both ? :-)
If you plan to include in SVN then the smallest
( Contained in make-3_81-r2-bin file from hobbes.nmsu.edu )
Okay, the larger one is the static build, the smaller uses
external libs. I'd opt for the static build as it has higher
chances to work on all OS/2 systems, unless this is a non-issue
on OS/2 systems. What do you think?
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
