Przemek is out of xharbour developer
Not a god news.

Someone was out, but there was no name, at least where I followed
it. Anyhow I don't see how someone out of xhb developer list could
hurt Harbour development.

Can i request collaboration between two project?

Anybody share this idea please post his note
Here my vision of fact:
Przemek is technical Guru, is genius that allow choice of High
reliability in harbour

Przemek is probably the most qualified developer I ever had
the fortune to meet, so neither his abilities, nor his attitude
towards Harbour (even xhb) and other developers isn't a question
for a second. xhb and Harbour would nowhere near it is without
his contribution.

This is software development, and we aim to create code which is
fit for mission critical uses, so every contributor has to accept
technical facts and input (even criticism) from others. This is
how it works. This doesn't mean we should be rude, or not value
others contributions, but when there is something wrong, we must
give a signal and we must accept educated opinions. Przemek's last
comment on Miguel's work were perfectly in line with these, the
answer of Ron Pinkas though was the kind of response which made
the Harbour/xhb split happen back then. Luckily, such e-mails are
absent from this list since then, and the results are easy to see.

Xharbour in past not remember copyright code copied from xharbour

Few xhb developers (one exactly) and project leaders (one exactly)
don't seem to want to comply with normal ethics and laws (and not able
to discuss something on pure technical merit). This is unfortunate,
but since we're mostly developers and not lawyers here, IMO we should
focus on continuing development, and reject developers from this
project who can't comply with these basic rules and just wastes our
time and spirit with such matters.

Harbour have more activity that xharbour.org

I hope this and above facts, plus the fact that Harbour is now
practically compatible with xhb, just with a much more solid
ground and more feature (and done right), will turn users and
developers towards Harbour.

Harbour and Xharbour must join effort to be more competitive
Wich solution you see for cooperation?

We've always valued contributors who can endorse our development style
(which values technical approach since the beginning). This is still
true, we had several contributors coming from xhb, and the doors are
still open: xhb (and former Harbour) contributors are welcome on our
list.

Brgds,
Viktor

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to