i have only post alternative for having harbour extension different from hbmk extension but agree with your idead hbl,hbp are better that hkl,hkp or other extension proposed
2009/5/24 Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu>: > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Massimo Belgrano <mbelgr...@deltain.it> > wrote: >> This will be my suggestion >> hml,hmp Harbour Mk2 (Link,project) >> hal,hap HArbour (Link,project) >> hhl,hhp Harbour..Harbour (Link,project) >> xhl,xhp eXtented harbour (Link,project) >> hpl,hpp Harbour Project(Link,project) > > I don't understand the purpose of these. IMO three extensions > is more than enough overall, or even *two*, since I'd favour -target > notation instead of special .hbt extension. I may even replace it > with -target=<file.hbm> format for clarity. > > This way: > current .hbp would become .hbl > current .hbm would become .hbp > > Simple. > > Brgds, > Viktor > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > -- Massimo Belgrano _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
